We bring you our Daily Intelligence Briefing courtesy of McAlinden Research Partners. The report is provided to Hedge Connection members for free. Below is snapshot, login to view the full report. Not a member? Join today.
McAlinden Research Partners is currently offering a complimentary full month subscription of the DIB. Activate yours today – http://www.mcalindenresearchpartners.com/hc-trial.html
Today’s Featured Topic Hypersonic China Shines a Light on Investor Opportunities in Silent Arms Race Summary: Behind the US-China trade war, there exists a very palpable arms race. Transformative technologies that are usually associated with consumer goods are being successfully translated into weapons of warfare faster than we have ever seen. China’s first successful test of a hypersonic missile has become the latest disruptive force in the tug of war, possibly reigniting US military efforts that have been falling behind the Chinese in recent years. On August 1, 2018, the US Congress approved in record speed the defense budget for the year 2019. The bill, which has earmarked a total budget of $717 billion, making it a record in more than 40 years, announced a 2.6 percent pay increase. An increase in salary may be an incentive for Americans to join armed forces, but most of the budget will go for the acquisition of R&D, weapons, and ammunition. While China’s current budget is much less than that, the difference is not as much as it seems at first glance. When personnel costs are removed from the equation, focusing squarely on equipment and technology, China’s military spending jumps from about a quarter of America’s to nearly a third. During the Cold War the nuclear arms race was all about building more and bigger warheads. Today the contest between the superpowers is for weapons that can beat existing missile defenses. Only days after Senators were putting their signatures on the new 2019 budget, China had just finished up a successful test of hypersonic weaponry — projectiles able to travel at least five times the speed of sound, about 3,800mph — becoming the third country, after the US and Russia, known to be developing superfast weaponry. This puts the Chinese military right on the heels of the US, whose efforts thus far have been labeled as “sluggish“. The Pentagon has itself admitted that it is already 5 to 10 years behind in the development of an anti-missile system to thwart advanced hypersonic weapons that are now being tested by China. This could mark a serious turning point in how America approaches their military future, especially with the Trump administration’s stalwart “peace through strength” philosophy which stresses having a military so powerful, that no nation dare provoke its use. However, It seems America has begun to hear the wakeup call recently as The US Missile Defense Agency asked for $120 million in its 2019 budget to develop hypersonic missile defenses, up from $75 million in this year’s. Companies are also making headway with lucrative government contracts. Lockheed Martin received a contract from the Air Force in April to build a hypersonic strike weapon that could be launched from fighters and bombers. The company is reported to have invested $100 million in corporate R&D in technologies that would advance hypersonic defense. The Air Force has another hypersonic effort called the Tactical Boost Glide program. The program is being developed with DARPA and could produce a prototype by 2022 or 2023. Raytheon is investing in hypersonic technology and developing ways to defend against the fast and unpredictable weapons. Meanwhile, Boeing has been working on hypersonic weapons technology for years, and in 2013 a test flight of its X-51 Waverider provided proof that it was feasible. The X-51 reached Mach 5 and flew for a total of six minutes. Michael Griffin, Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, recently cautioned that a new layer of sensors via asatellite network will be needed in the future for “persistent, timely, global, low-latency surveillance to track and provide fire control for hypersonic threats.” Last week, MRP noted the significant role satellite technology would have to play in the defense of American telecommunications infrastructure in the coming years. This role would be especially magnified by the oncoming US Space force initiative, which Vice President Pence and Defense Secretary Mattis just announced would be operational by 2020. However, such posturing may just be bluster to one up the Chinese government, whose statements increasingly sound more confident that they’ve already won the space race. Ye Peijian, the head of the Chinese lunar-exploration, has previously compared the possibility of space conflict to the ongoing South China Sea conflict: “The universe is an ocean, the moon is the Diaoyu Islands, Mars is Huangyan Island. If we don’t go there now even though we’re capable of doing so, then we will be blamed by our descendants. If others go there, then they will take over, and you won’t be able to go even if you want to. This is reason enough.” Ye’s mention of the Diaoyu Islands, which the Japanese also claim and contest, and of Huangyan Island, which the Philippines also claim and contest, recall Beijing’s behavior in the South China Sea. China unilaterally, and in violation of international law, claims 90% of the South China Sea. This kind of rhetoric could set the tone for how the Chinese are preparing to approach the space race, and is sure to catch the attention of the Trump administration. The other side of the story relates to robotics and automation. The US has already begun prototyping self-generating “Ironman-like” soldier exoskeletons. Attachments for which currently in development include helmets with high-resolution thermal sensors, wearable computers, and various kinds of conformal liquid body armor. Bomb disposal robots already play a huge role in the military and advancements in virtual reality are making personnel in control of the bots much more efficient. Perhaps the most disruptive trend in warfare though, is the proliferation of artificial intelligence on the battlefield. Applications range from unmanned aerial vehicles, powered by next-generation low-wattage CPUs, to streamlining a number of key computer cybersecurity tasks. Until now, weapons such as torpedoes and Tomahawk cruise missiles had only a partial degree of autonomy but not complete. Today, autonomous weapons and communications systems are increasingly meeting the requirements of the Defense Science Board, a committee of civilian experts appointed to advise the U.S. Department of Defense. Increased computer automation is already performing a large function in maintenance. Specifically, the Navy’s emerging Ford-Class aircraft carriers. The new carriers use advanced algorithms to perform diagnostics and other on-board maintenance and procedural tasks independently. This, Navy developers say, allows the service to reduce its crew size by as many as 900 sailors per carrier and save up to $4 billion dollars over the life of a ship. While the US has made strides in this space, China continues to keep pace. For example, the East Asian super power is developing large, smart and relatively low-cost unmanned submarines, slated for deployment in the 2020s, that can roam the world’s oceans to perform a wide range of missions, from reconnaissance to mine placement to even suicide attacks against enemy vessels. China is also pushing AI in tank warfare by reportedly converting its old Type 59 Soviet tanks into unmanned vehicles fitted with AI. Reports indicate that back in 2014, China had set up its first dedicated research center for unmanned ground vehicles. Further, the momentum seems to be shifting. During the period 2011-2015, China had published more than 41,000 research papers on AI, almost double the number of that of the United States. China is also ahead of the United States in patent applications for AI. Compounding this, last month saw some of the biggest names in technology sign a pledge promising not to develop lethal autonomous weapons. Internal pushback in companies like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon, have made executives squeamish about taking military defense contracts. China’s authoritarian, single party government will not have nearly as hard a time making sure their country’s AI firms keep their eyes on the prize. If the US cannot get similar cooperation from its leaders in tech, the AI advantage, and American military dominance as a whole, could end up more in jeopardy than it already is. This evolving arms race shows no signs of going away anytime soon and constant competition should continue to force massive investment into military technologies. MRP added Aerospace & Defense, as well as Robotics & Automation, to our list of themes on November 27, 2013 and July 20, 2017, respectively. Since we launched the theme, The iShares US Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) has generated a return of 98% against the S&P’s 57% over the same period. The Robo Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO) has returned 14% , performing roughly on par with the S&P’s 15%. We’ve also summarized the following articles related to this topic in the Manufacturing & Logistics section of today’s report.
|
Chart: Aerospace & Defense (ITA) vs Robotics & Automation (ROBO) vs S&P 500 (SPY)
|
Other Disruptive Change
Labor, Education & Demographics
|
Joe Mac’s Market Viewpoint |
|
The U.S. capital markets had a challenging time in the first half of 2018. While the brouhaha about trade wars has been cited by experts as the cause of this year’s rise in volatility, MRP believes otherwise. Extended valuations, investor sentiment, portfolio leverage, an ageing bull market, inflation, and a Fed tightening cycle are all headwinds. In short, several large forces are at play and they will continue to pressure both equity and bond prices in the second half of this year. Joe Mac’s Market Viewpoint: U.S. Markets at Midyear →
Other Viewpoint Reports Joe Mac’s Market Viewpoint: CAPEX Booms! → Joe Mac’s Market Viewpoint: The Inflation Complication → |
Current MRP Themes |
|
|
Major Data Points |
|
1.
|
US Inflation Rate Unchanged at Over 6-Year High US annual inflation rate stood at 2.9 percent in July 2018, unchanged from the previous month and slightly below market expectations of 3 percent. Still, inflation remained at its highest level since February 2012. Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, rose to 2.4 percent in July from 2.3 percent in June, hitting the highest rate since September 2008. TE |
2. |
US Core Inflation Rate Highest Since 2008 US annual core inflation rate, which excludes volatile items such as food and energy, rose to 2.4 percent in July 2018 from 2.3 percent in the previous month, and above market expectations of 2.3 percent. It was the highest rate since September 2008. TE |
3.
|
US Budget Deficit Widens in July The US budget deficit widened sharply to USD 77.0 billion in July 2018 from USD 42.9 billion in the same month of the previous year, slightly below market expectations of USD 77.8 billion. When accounting for calendar adjustments, the government’s deficit was USD 124 billion compared to a deficit of USD 85 billion in the same month the previous year. The gap for the fiscal year, which began last October, was USD 684 billion, compared to a deficit of USD 566 billion in the same period of the previous fiscal year. TE |
4. |
Dollar Index Hits 13-month High US Dollar increased to a 13-month high of 96.33. TE |
5. |
Euro Drops Below $1.14 The euro dropped more than 1% to trade $1.14 around midday New York on Friday following news that the ECB is increasingly concerned about some European lenders’ exposure to Turkey in particular BBVA of Spain, UniCredit of Italy and BNP Paribas of France as the lira slumped more than 20%. TE |
6. |
Turkish Lira Plunges The Turkish lira continued its slide on Friday dropping as much as 20% to 6.637 against the US dollar. The sharp sell-off intensified after President Trump tweeted that US will double the tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum. In addition to deteriorating relations between the US and Turkey, investors are worried about the country’s overheating economy and the government’s lack of willingness to address the problem. TE |
Other Disruptive Change |
|
There is much more to this report! McAlinden Research Partners offers Hedge Connection members weekly access to the Daily Intelligence Briefing research for free – click here to view. (You must be logged in first). Not a member? Join today. McAlinden Research Partners is currently offering a complimentary full month subscription of the DIB. Activate yours today – http://www.mcalindenresearchpartners.com/hc-trial.html |
Leave a Reply